Osprey Tempest 50 Review
Packstack is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. This does not affect the independence or objectivity of our reviews.
A women's-specific 50L backpacking pack that balances low weight with real-world comfort — here's how it holds up on multi-day trips.
Overview
The Tempest 50 is Osprey’s women’s-specific mid-weight backpacking pack, sitting in that in-between zone that’s too heavy to call “ultralight” but noticeably lighter than a traditional expedition hauler. It’s built for weekend trips through multi-day thru-hikes where you’re not counting every gram but still want to shave weight where it’s easy to do. At 1470 g (about 3 lb 3 oz), it’s a reasonable middle ground for hikers who want structure, a real hipbelt, and organization without lugging a 5-lb pack.
Key Specs
| Spec | Detail |
|---|---|
| Volume | 50 L |
| Weight | 1470 g (~3 lb 3 oz) |
| Gender fit | Women’s-specific |
| Frame | Injection-molded AirScape HDPE framesheet |
| Material | Bluesign-approved recycled high-tenacity nylon, PFC-free DWR |
| Hydration compatible | Yes |
| Torso range | Roughly 14–19 in (varies by size: WXS/S, WM/L) |
| Hipbelt range | Roughly 40–70 in depending on version |
Would the Tempest 50 earn its spot in your pack?
1470 g · 51.9 ozAdd the Osprey Tempest 50 to your gear closet and see exactly what it does to your base weight — then build your next packing list around it. Free, in about two minutes.
Free · No credit card · iOS & Android · Trusted by 3,000+ backpackers
Performance
The standout feature here is the AirScape back panel. It’s an injection-molded HDPE framesheet with foam ridges designed to keep the load close to your back while still letting air move through the channels. One reviewer who tested it found the panel features EVA padding with injection moulded Airscape HDPE, and in practice that translates to a pack that stays stable on technical terrain without turning into a sweat trap on climbs. A separate reviewer testing the related Talon/Tempest platform noted they didn’t get an overly sweaty back, even during some brutal climbs — a good sign for the ventilation design, even though that specific test covered the sibling model.
Fit is where the women’s-specific design earns its keep. The Tempest’s hipbelt is sculpted and angled to sit on a women’s hip shape for optimal support, according to Osprey, with a narrower height to avoid digging into the ribs or upper thighs, and testers who tried it on found this to be true as the Tempest fit their hips well and was very comfortable to wear while moving. The pack is also shaped differently than its unisex/men’s counterpart — the Talon sports a longer torso measurement and is overall a visually taller pack, while the Tempest is designed with a shorter and more narrow torso with added depth for greater freedom of movement. If you’ve struggled with men’s-fit packs riding too tall or hipbelts that don’t wrap correctly, this is the actual selling point, not just a marketing footnote.
On the organization side, one long-term user liked the hip belt pockets a lot, noting two zippered pockets on the hip belt make for easy access to things you might need on the go like snacks, sunscreen, compass etc, and they fit a surprising amount in them. The harness and belt aren’t just bolted-on pieces either — the hip belt and harness has a continuous lumbar-to-hipbelt wrap that’s a little stretchy and moves with you as you hike, which is the kind of detail you don’t notice until mile 12 when your pack isn’t fighting your stride.
It’s not without gripes. The same reviewer who put in real trail time flagged three specific weak points: it lacks a rain cover, could do with a little more padding in the lumbar area, and there are access issues with the hydration sleeve. None of these are dealbreakers, but they’re worth planning around — budget $20-30 for a separate rain cover (Osprey sells one that’s compatible), and know that refilling or swapping a hydration bladder mid-hike may require more digging than you’d like.
Capacity-wise, 50L puts this pack in a sweet spot: a 30-50L pack range is generally suited to bike, thru-hiking, and climbing with a load range of 15-40 lbs, while 50-80L is more for backpacking, guiding, and thru-hiking with 25-60 lb loads. That means the Tempest 50 is best treated as a lighter-load pack — great if your base weight is dialed in, less great if you’re hauling four days of food plus winter gear.
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- Women’s-specific hipbelt and torso shaping that multiple testers confirmed actually fits differently (and better) than unisex packs
- AirScape framesheet keeps ventilation solid even on sustained climbs
- Hip belt pockets are genuinely useful and hold more than they look like they should
- Reasonable weight (1470 g) for a pack with a real frame and hipbelt, not a frameless UL rig
- Bluesign-approved recycled nylon and PFC-free DWR — a legitimate sustainability upgrade, not greenwashing
Cons:
- No included rain cover — factor that into your budget and pack weight
- Hydration sleeve access is awkward according to hands-on reviewers
- Lumbar padding is thinner than some users would like on longer carries
- At 50L, it’s not built for heavy loads beyond roughly 35-40 lbs — pushing past that will strain the frame and hipbelt
Who Should Buy This
This pack makes sense for women hikers doing weekend-to-week-long trips who’ve already trimmed their base weight down but still want a supportive hipbelt, a real frame, and decent organization rather than a minimalist roll-top. If you’ve tried unisex 50-55L packs and found the torso or hipbelt shape uncomfortable, this is worth trying specifically for the fit difference. It’s less suited to anyone hauling consistently heavy loads (bear canister plus winter gear, say) or anyone who wants a true sub-2-lb ultralight setup — for those, look further down the weight spectrum or up the frame-capacity spectrum.
Verdict
The Tempest 50 nails the fit-and-ventilation fundamentals that matter most on long days, and the hip belt pockets and recycled materials are nice bonuses rather than gimmicks. Knock a rain cover and a slightly better hydration sleeve design onto the wish list, and this is a genuinely solid mid-weight pack — I’d put it at a 7.8/10, a confident buy for the right use case rather than a universal recommendation.